[ Work ] Message 400 (31 left): Mon Feb 1, 1999  9:46am
From: Big My Secret (socks@ella)
Subject: yeah
4 lines (?)

I don't have any money at all. I don't shop anywhere. The mad shopper what
doesn't shop at midnight. So lemme ask too- why IS it okay to shop at
K, dani?
[ Work ] Message 401 (30 left): Mon Feb 1, 1999  9:54am
From: Typsy (tiffany@ella)
Subject: hmmm
8 lines (?)
i think the last....5 or  so books i've gotten have been
at walden pond books on grand ave

it's a rilly rilly rilly cool bookstore, cheap used stuff,

eveyrone should go there :)

[ Work ] Message 402 (29 left): Mon Feb 1, 1999  9:55am
From: Typsy (tiffany@ella)
Subject: oh yeah
7 lines (?)
and then there's the $1 bookstore on broadway, kinda stuck in the
middle between auto row and rockridge

you can find all kinds of cool stuff, and *everything* there
is a dollar
and sometimes they'll let you take 6 for 5 dollars or something

[ Work ] Message 403 (28 left): Mon Feb 1, 1999  10:14am
From: sharon (sharon@ella)
Subject: shopping habits
30 lines (?)
*taps fingers impatiently waiting for Dani's response*

See, mid-class lectures on where one should and should not shop irritate
me. The reason I'm picking on Aidan here is because Aidan interrupted
the cliterature class to deliver a lecture on the evils of Amazon.com and
large chain bookstores. But the *context* was on trying to find an out-of-
print book, when normal rules do not apply.

While I shop indies 95% of the time, there are times that I will shop
large chains -- especially when I'm buying gifts for someone who lives
in a difference city or state -- and I know that they can exchange the
gift locally if it doesn't suit them. (Which turned out well when I went
book buying for presents for my Mom -- she already had one of the books
I bought her, and it was an easy exchange at the San Diego Borders, when
it would have been a pain in the ass has I bought at a local (Bay Area)
indie bookstore.)

For films/videos I shop indie (and rent videos from Boadacias when I can
-- they've got a great selection of queer films --  you should check them
out Jovida, while you're putting together your film list).

But I do NOT like being lectured about it -- especially by someone whose
shopping habits are erratic and politically inconsistent. nah, what
really bugged me was getting the class discussion off-topic. It's too
easy, especially in a lezzie literature class, to get off topic. Please
avoid the temptation.

Thank you.

*bows and exits stage left*
[ Work ] Message 404 (27 left): Mon Feb 1, 1999  10:34am
From: xi (cdenton@ella)
Subject: thank you
2 lines (?)
[ Work ] Message 405 (26 left): Mon Feb 1, 1999  10:40am
From: xi (cdenton@ella)
Subject: i think..
5 lines (?)
last night, when i questioned danica about super k, she said
that "they" had decided that you can't all be perfect...
i donno who they is, hence the airquotes
which meant that we were no longer allowed to bug her about it,
[ Work ] Message 406 (25 left): Mon Feb 1, 1999  10:45am
From: rat (tamerat@ella)
Subject: but
6 lines (?)

did you MAKE airquotes while typing?

sf sucks because there IS nothing like super k.
though i try not to buy things made in china, sometimes
you think "is this really worth paying 420 more for somewhere else?"
[ Work ] Message 407 (24 left): Mon Feb 1, 1999  10:53am
From: xi (cdenton@ella)
Subject: yeah..
4 lines (?)
not made in china prices suck...

i thought airquotes

[ Work ] Message 408 (23 left): Mon Feb 1, 1999  10:57am
From: sharon (sharon@ella)
Subject: "allowed" ??
4 lines (?)
I think I am (insert air quotes) ALLOWED to bug Dani as much as I like.
And I invite all of you to do the same.

[ Work ] Message 409 (22 left): Mon Feb 1, 1999  11:04am
From: Typsy (tiffany@ella)
Subject: um..
9 lines (?)

in the hallway, one tall african-amerian male temp named
eugene at one end of the hallway talking to me, another
tall african-american male temp named eugene right in front
of me talking to me


[ Work ] Message 410 (21 left): Mon Feb 1, 1999  11:07am
From: xi (cdenton@ella)
Subject: but.. but.. sharon!!
3 lines (?)
danica told me that we weren't allowed to!
that danica is allowed to bug us, but we are not allowed to bug her!
and she said it, so it must be right!
[ Work ] Message 411 (20 left): Mon Feb 1, 1999  11:19am
From: rat (tamerat@ella)
Subject: my feet are cold
4 lines (?)

okee, even.
[ Work ] Message 412 (19 left): Mon Feb 1, 1999  11:31am
From:  (scrawl@ella)
7 lines (?)
danica said that?
i mustve been out of the room

i thot it silly to say super k was allright when b and n isnt because
k puts a lot of different types of stores out of business; not just books
:P :P :P
[ Work ] Message 413 (18 left): Mon Feb 1, 1999  12:21pm
From: sharon (sharon@ella)
Subject: who makes the rules
7 lines (?)

Among the people in the world:

1. I make rules.
2. Aidanica/Derek/Door/Kenneth does not.

So there. Because I'm the mommy, THAT's why.

[ Work ] Message 414 (17 left): Mon Feb 1, 1999  12:24pm
From: Typsy (tiffany@ella)
Subject: heh
4 lines (?)
now can i call you 'mommy', sharon?
especially very loudly in the m center?
please huh, can i can i?

[ Work ] Message 415 (16 left): Mon Feb 1, 1999  12:27pm
From:  (scrawl@ella)
4 lines (?)

i wanna call you mommy in the m center!
preferabbly with lots of decorative moaning
[ Work ] Message 416 (15 left): Mon Feb 1, 1999  12:44pm
From: sharon (sharon@ella)
Subject: no
11 lines (?)
I make the rules.

No one is ALLOWED to call me Mommy. Unless you are a genetic
(not adopted -- you know how I am about adoptees) offspring of mine.
Last time I checked, none of you are my offspring.

(Of course, if you were, we could have taken advantage of that
nice tuition remission benefit...)

(But that did make me laugh. Thank you.
[ Work ] Message 417 (14 left): Mon Feb 1, 1999  12:58pm
From: Typsy (tiffany@ella)
Subject: hey
3 lines (?)
can i ahve some money?

[ Work ] Message 418 (13 left): Mon Feb 1, 1999  12:59pm
From: Big My Secret (socks@ella)
Subject: How about
4 lines (?)

Mommy Knuckles?

Dishing out "Offas Yeh Can't Refuse"
[ Work ] Message 419 (12 left): Mon Feb 1, 1999  1:02pm
From: Typsy (tiffany@ella)
Subject: heh heh
6 lines (?)

i LIKE that
mommy knuckles

no, it's not abusive, i swear!

[ Work ] Message 420 (11 left): Mon Feb 1, 1999  1:15pm
From: Big My Secret (socks@ella)
Subject: you have
6 lines (?)

ten chances to tell me where my money is...

one: where's my money?
/"Bound" reference
[ Work ] Message 421 (10 left): Mon Feb 1, 1999  1:42pm
From: That's Mr. Mommy Knuckles to you (sharon@ella)
Subject: the rules
16 lines (?)


*quits job*

*gets high-paying tech job*

*leave students subject to the whims of other administrators who don't
pet names*

*shops at Barnes and Noble*

*eats veal*

*curls into fetal position*

[ Work ] Message 422 (9 left): Mon Feb 1, 1999  1:46pm
From: commie cola (that shoule be a brand, damn it!) (cola@ella)
Subject: heh
6 lines (?)

mmm....b and n.....
(barnes and noble was the biggest bookstore i had ever been in when i was
in HS....)

[ Work ] Message 423 (8 left): Mon Feb 1, 1999  1:50pm
From: Typsy (tiffany@ella)
Subject: heh
5 lines (?)

i'm glad i could be a part of this, mr mommy knukles

knuckles, even

[ Work ] Message 424 (7 left): Mon Feb 1, 1999  3:49pm
From: sharon (sharon@ella)
Subject: new rule
5 lines (?)
You can call me "Mommy" if you do it with air quotes.

Ok, not really.

*still waiting for aidanica's response on her political in/consistency*
[ Work ] Message 425 (6 left): Mon Feb 1, 1999  3:52pm
From: Typsy (tiffany@ella)
Subject: i am
7 lines (?)
pretending that i do not konw what the not really was referring

okay, Mommy

(i made air quotes, i swear i did)

[ Work ] Message 426 (5 left): Mon Feb 1, 1999  5:08pm
From:  (scrawl@ella)
3 lines (?)

yeah; im still waiting too.
come on dani!
[ Work ] Message 427 (4 left): Mon Feb 1, 1999  5:20pm
From: starfucker (ash512@ella)
Subject: dani
14 lines (?)
1 the lecture she gave on amazon.com was in context
and it was good since people mught not uv looked at
the handout that had alternatives to amazon on it
and that deosn't sound like a good justification for atttacking hir
2 yeah dani gets preachy and high and mighty radikal
but that it isn't an excuse to all gang up on hir like
this...so ze's human...so what? also making fun uv hir names
is rilly innapropriate...lotuv other cultures had people
choose thier own name several time in life...and it has nothing
to do with the subject...yeah dani's not perfect but
ze is commited to a politkal life which i believe is
admirable...by the way if any uv you care ze didn't
buy anything at kmart...as hir big brother i couldn't
just let ya'll gang up on hir
[ Work ] Message 428 (3 left): Mon Feb 1, 1999  5:28pm
From:  (scrawl@ella)
7 lines (?)

so exactly where did we make fun of danica's names? I don't recall
seeing that anywhere on this forum.
as for danica's rant on amazon.com, there are good reasons not to shop
i dont really have an opinion on it since i'm not in that class. But it's
a little distrubing when people who take chain bookstores very seriously
(as they should be taken) also shop at even larger chains such at Kmart.
[ Work ] Message 429 (2 left): Mon Feb 1, 1999  5:40pm
From: xi (cdenton@ella)
Subject: so...
14 lines (?)
next time danica starts picking on other people for not being perfect,
you'll come to their defense?
especially those who have choosen not to encourage non-union chain

the only reason i am asking is because i have seen danica attack a lot
of people for not being perfect... and a lot of people don't like
being attacked by someone who's not going to actually do what she
yells at people about..

but thats just my personal opinion.. i mean, she interagates others,
so, i don't think she can be that upset about it without
questioning how she talks to others...

[ Work ] Message 430 (1 left): Mon Feb 1, 1999  5:51pm
From: starfucker (ash512@ella)
Subject: dani
7 lines (?)
 so you guys hat it when ze does this to you, right?
hate it i mean...so why should ze feel any differently?
besides when ze does that do other people ze is just 1
person not a bunch uv people which does make things different
next time you feel like ze is expecting one uv u to be perfect
then remind hir uv how it felt...i'm not defending what ze has
done in the past...i just don't like bullys in any form
[ Work ] Message 431 (0 left): Mon Feb 1, 1999  6:21pm
From: rat (tamerat@ella)
Subject: um
7 lines (?)

it does feel like yer ganging up on her.

i dunno.

just my 2 cents

[ Work ] Message 432 (0 left): Mon Feb 1, 1999  6:49pm
From: That's Mr. "Mommy" to YOU (sharon@ella)
Subject: ganging up?
14 lines (?)
I posted to make a point. Not to gang up on (or start ganging up on)
Danica. (As
 for Star's point about making fun of Danica's name -- well, you know,
it's hard
 to keep track of what s/he wants to be called. Truly. I was trying to be
ive. Zie liked

I posted honestly -- Super K (K Mart, and WalMart, and the like) hurt
s they enter. I remember the big ruckus in Alameda before and around the
time Su
per K opened, about how it was going to hurt small business in Alameda
(which I'
m sure it has).

And I have shopped there -- once, in the middle of the night, I couldn't
sleep (
I was in Oakland) for lack of a decent pillow. It was 3am, Super K was
open, I w
ent and bought a pillow.

But the difference, you see, is that I don't pretend to be perfect. I
don't lect
ure people about where and what they should and should not buy. And I
*hate* whe
n class time is taken away to do that kind of prostelytizing. Especially
when so
meone is going

I even wondered if there was some class issue involved here. I mean, Super
K is
good because it has historically been a working-class store? (I know my
lass friends used to make fun of it -- and we mocked my sister for working
.) Whereas B&N/

But I really did (do) want to hear from Aidan on this topic. Why is it ok
to sho
p Super K and not big chain bookstores?

(oops sorry for the lack of returns up there. You an deal, right?
crappy mac... )

[ Work ] Message 433 (5 left): Mon Feb 1, 1999  7:45pm
From: jov (dorje@ella)
Subject: ok...
15 lines (?)

mebbe this wasn't intended as a flame war, but it haaas
definitely become one. And it's all aimed at dboy,
so it *is* ganging up on hir.

and i just want to point out, no one's defending super-K
making this into a class issue is inappropriate, in my opinion...
the point is to lay off dani, and tell hir *when* *it* *happens*
next time ze's being over-zealous, instead of venting
pent-up anger all over forum.

and yes, I will personally stick up fer whoever dani interrogates
next, but I'm guessing that ze'll remember all this on hir own for a while

[ Work ] Message 434 (4 left): Mon Feb 1, 1999  8:59pm
From: jov (dorje@ella)
Subject: actually
7 lines (?)

let me revise that:
I will personally stand up for anyone who dani
*beligerently* interrogates...
just plain questioning w/o attitude I don't have
a problem with.

[ Work ] Message 435 (3 left): Mon Feb 1, 1999  10:50pm
From: starfucker (ash512@ella)
Subject: ganging up
11 lines (?)

well there were 3-5 people going after 1 person
and in not just 1 post each but many posts
that fits my defintion uv ganging up on someone
the issue here is not super k...i won't defend it
and bringing class into the issue just feels like
a personal attack that has nothing to do with this discussion
i saw a bunch uv people going after my brother and
i felt i had to say that it was unfair
that is *the issue*...if u are angry at hir for past
expeirences this is unproductive and meanspirted way uv
expressing that
[ Work ] Message 436 (2 left): Mon Feb 1, 1999  10:53pm
From:  (scrawl@ella)
7 lines (?)
how was this "flame war" all directed at dani? As i recall, sharon asked
an honest question which others then expressed interest in having
I dont re;e;ber sharon's tone as being hostile in any way. IIRC, star felt
that danica was being ganged up on, which is when everyone started
Danica may not have interrogated anyone, but the topic had legitimately
come up, since Sharon asked the question bc of what dani said in the lit

[ Work ] Message 437 (1 left): Mon Feb 1, 1999  10:54pm
From:  (scrawl@ella)
3 lines (?)

ok. how is discussing this as a class issue ;aking you feel personally
attacked? I'm not asking because i think thats silly, i want to
[ Work ] Message 438 (0 left): Mon Feb 1, 1999  11:21pm
From: jov (dorje@ella)
Subject: hmm
19 lines (?)

2 things:

1) the subject came up in reference to dboy shopping at kmart, with
an atmosphere of "yeah, you hypocryte"... maybe with some legitimacy
(that's not the point i'm debating), but everyone jumped on the bandwagon
*that's* how it was directed at dani and hostile-feeling.

2) the question of class didn't have anything to do with the topic
at hand (i.e. dani's history of proselytizing in light of her
desire to go to kmart)... besides, dani, while well-intentioned about
class, doesn't have the personal experience to have that particular
argument about kmart... Star, on the other hand, has been very honest
about coming from a working-class background, and not too long ago
was involved in a forum discussion w/ y'all specifically about class
issues. Since class was only brought into *this* conversation
*after* star posted, it does seem to be specifically directed at hir.

[ Work ] Message 439 (7 left): Tue Feb 2, 1999  9:33am
From: Big My Secret (socks@ella)
Subject: Arrrrgggghhhh

Jovida: if being legitimately curious about some of Dani's logic is
jumping on the bandwagon, I find that marvelous close to being insulted
for existing in the first place: who the hell hasn't been curious about
how she thinks?

Look, we all know each other here- nobody is out on a lynching party,
which I think everyone tends to forget. Asking Dani to either stand behind
her words and/or stand corrected is not "Ganging Up On Her."
        Standing behind what we say or admitting we were wrong, or
mistaken, or whatever, is part of having an adult conversation. I love
Dani, I am proud to have someone as politically motivated as she is as a
freind. However, I will not stop asking her to justify what she says.
[ Work ] Message 440 (6 left): Tue Feb 2, 1999  9:36am
From: rat (tamerat@ella)
Subject: well.

not just waiting calmly for dani to answer and instead having everyone
saying "yeah, yeah, answer! where are you! answer!" in
986453876534576435 posts was a little creepy. i mean, settle down.

if sharon had posted, waited for d's answer, then the rest of
forum had been involved in a discussion, that would be different, i think.
[ Work ] Message 441 (5 left): Tue Feb 2, 1999  10:02am
From:  (scrawl@ella)

id just like to say that its really hard to get out of bed when you
have flannel sheets and theres no insulation where you live.
i really should get to work.
[ Work ] Message 442 (4 left): Tue Feb 2, 1999  10:11am
From: sharon (sharon@ella)
Subject: damn quickie posting from home

Ok, I see that my post did not make it to forum in its entirety. *That's*
what I get (or you get) when I try to sneak in a quickie forum session at
home (before a date).

Ok, I did NOT bring up "class and K-Mart" to be pointed because of Star's
entrance into the conversation. I'm sorry that felt pointed at you; that
definitely was not my intent.

Given Dani's silence on the topic, I did some musing as to why
"K-Mart=Good, Big Chain Bookstores=Bad" topic. As I mentioned (and I think
that part made it into the post) my older sister used to work at K-Mart.
So, even though I am not a frequent shopping there, I do have a passing
familiarity with the store and its business/employment practices. And the
above *as a class issue*.

People in my middle-class, educated family are expected to go into the
professions, are expected to have middle-class, professional jobs. (Well,
you all know what I do for a living; my younger sister is an attorney.)
So, Amy's stint at K-Mart was an anomaly for the family -- and I was
curious about exploring that, especially in light of the discussions
around chain stores.

As far as Danica's name goes  (this didn't make it all into the post) --
zie hirself has given hirself LOTS of names and gone by lots of monikers
over the past 1-2 years: off the top of my head, I can recall: Danica,
Aidan, D-boy, Kenneth, Derek. Who's to know what's the appropriate name at
a given moment? how to balance teasing hir with being respectful of what
zie may want to be called at a given moment? Truly, I don't think I'm
talented enough to suss that out.

You know, it feels very odd to have this discussion guessing about what
Aidan feels -- is it ganging up on hir to have this conversation? What it
showed me is that I am not the only one who's been annoyed at being
lectured about this stuff (and irritated that the lectures come from
someone who apparently has a cause celebre and doesn't apply hir
principles consistently).

Tell hir when it happens that it bugs me? You mean, take up MORE class
time to do it? No thanks. That won't happen.

And this isn't "pent-up anger" -- thank you. It started as a serious
question -- I was (and am) curious as to what the difference is for Aidan
about Super K vs. Big Chain Bookstores. I added (to be honest) that part
of what was going on for me in the background was my irritation at hir
side-tracking the class discusssion. But it's not "pent-up anger."

None of this (at least not on my end) was mean-spirited.

[ Work ] Message 443 (3 left): Tue Feb 2, 1999  10:59am
From: Typsy (tiffany@ella)
Subject: hmmm

i agree with sharon
all i have to say is that i certainly did not
mean that aas an attack on dani -- and if she
took it that way, then my apology is directed
towards her, but so far she has said nothing
on the subject of her being 'attacked'...a lot
of people seem to be speaking for her here....

and i just took teh opportunity to ramble about
independent bookstores i like...i sure hope *taht*
didn't offend anyone, but i guess you never know....

[ Work ] Message 444 (2 left): Tue Feb 2, 1999  11:01am
From: Typsy (tiffany@ella)
Subject: okay

before anyone 'attacks' me about it (bad word
choice there?)

i will correct the pronouns --zie and hir?
is that right?

glad i saw that one coming..that could have started
an entirely new flame war

[ Work ] Message 445 (1 left): Tue Feb 2, 1999  11:04am
From: sharon (sharon@ella)
Subject: owning biases

I said what I did (i.e., this is flavored because of Aidan's in-class
lecturing/posturing AND my own background vis a vis K-Mart because
I think it's important to acknowlege our biases and positions in
conversations such as these.

Really and truly, I'd like to see Aidan take responsibility for hir
actions and words and behavior. I have the feeling (but, of course, given
hir silence here, can't be sure) that zie is angry at "us" (the "us" who
are accusing of ganging up on hir) -- and so is using that anger as a
platform and an excuse to NOT answer some honestly-asked questions.

[ Work ] Message 446 (0 left): Tue Feb 2, 1999  11:21am
From: xi (cdenton@ella)
Subject: well..

i wasn't attacking anyone, more curious as to what danica would say..
and apparently "being curious" is justifiable cause for danica
to tell clst that "it's a secret, but i hate your wife"
i don't think that theorizing on why someone does something
is neccesarly attcking, althought it could be.. i don't really
think it was in this case tho..
but, i really don't feel sorry for danica for feeling attacked, which
is apparently what she feels, but it's solely because i'm just taking that
whole "hate" thing personally....
i think hates a pretty strong word, and i personally don't think you
should call up people you hate and ask them for rides and favors
and stuff..  but i guess thats just me...

[ Work ] Message 447 (0 left): Tue Feb 2, 1999  1:06pm
From: jov (dorje@ella)
Subject: well
8 lines (?)

despite any of y'all's good intentions, it came off and is
still coming off as attacking hir...
if *one* person was making this many posts directed at one
individual, it'd be a "take it to email"
situation. Just because it's half of forum doesn't
mean it's any more appropriate.

[ Work ] Message 449 (0 left): Tue Feb 2, 1999  2:31pm
From: commie cola (cola@ella)
Subject: yeah
4 lines (?)

because y'all have a long history of respecting dani when she attempts to
express not wating to talk about something......

[ Work ] Message 450 (1 left): Tue Feb 2, 1999  3:38pm
From: Trooper6 (penni@ella)
Subject: whoah
52 lines (?)

I "c" through a whole bunch of posts and miss all sorts of stuff...I don't
even know what y'all are talking about.

Anyway...let's start a new flame war.  Star is not the only person of a
working class background here at this school.  Although I did not have the
pleasure of reading the discussion on class, nor the original post about
Amazon.com, I just want to point that little fact out.  I only say this
because I have heard on many occassion comments to that effect.

Let's have a discussion.

Post 1:  I can't believe Troop attacked Star like that! Troop is evil.
Post 2:  No she's not.  That wasn't an attack, she was just stating an
opinion.  If Star chooses to take it as a comment towards her, that up to her.
Post 3:  My mother's best friend was working class, so obviously that post
was  about me, not Star.  Why are you attacking me?
Post 4:  Steph's such a hypocrite, she has so much priviledge.  Who does
she  think she is to even discuss this topic?  She making fun of the
struggles of the very small percentage of working class people in this school.
Post 5:  There is actually a very large percentage of working class people
in  this school.
Post 6:  Well, I've never seen any of them, they are obviously hiding
under the bougeous affectations.
Post 7:  Is that directed towards me?  Why do you always attack my
convictions.  I volunteer to help welfare mothers all the time what do you do?
Post 8:  Really?  But you have a new car.
Post 9:  That's true. Poster 7 has a new car, from 1997.
Post 10:  Why is everyone picking on Poster 7--that new car came from
Poster 7's  freshly dead grandmother...that doesn't make her any less class
Post 11:  That's hypocritical...if her grandma is rich, then she's not
working  class--she's beugeous, I'm the only working class one here.
Post 12:  Forget class, I'm passive-aggressive.  The plight of
passive-aggresive people has been totally forgotten here at Mills.
Post 13:  Passive-aggresive people have no issure...you're just taking the
focus  off of MY oppression...I'm left handed and we were persecuted all
throughout  time...murdered even.
Post 14:  So what?  I'm a Pisces and no one wants to date Pisces...I'm the
Post 15:  No one wants to date you just because you are annoying.
Post 16:  Why do you always pick-on Poster 14?
Post 17:  Hey, wait a minute!  I dated you Poster 14. Don't I count
anymore?  What was I chopped liver?
Post 18:  As a carnivore, I am very offended by the use of the term
"chopped liver" as something derogatory.
Post 19:  But chopped liver is awful and patriarchal.
Post 20:  My mother was a door-to-door chopped liver saleswoman for many
years, so I know what I'm talking about...why do you mock my family strife?!

Um...I think I'll stop now...I'm having too much fun.

[ Work ] Message 453 (3 left): Tue Feb 2, 1999  3:51pm
From: rat (tamerat@ella)
Subject: um penni
5 lines (?)

i have to come rescue you know, you've been at mills too long.

[ Work ] Message 454 (2 left): Tue Feb 2, 1999  3:53pm
From:  (scrawl@ella)
6 lines (?)

penni, i put that whole post in my plan, and am changing my sig to the
post about passive agressivity.
thank you so much.
you made my day.
i am happy now.
[ Work ] Message 455 (1 left): Tue Feb 2, 1999  4:08pm
From: beef (beef@ella)
Subject: Hey,
4 lines (?)
I take offence at that jab at pisces (post # 14).
It reflects upon people like me poorly

[ Work ] Message 456 (0 left): Tue Feb 2, 1999  4:31pm
From: sharon (sharon@ella)
Subject: Penni
2 lines (?)
I am proud to know you.

[ Work ] Message 457 (0 left): Wed Feb 3, 1999  9:43am
From: Big My Secret (socks@ella)
Subject: PENNI
4 lines (?)

I  penni

I haven's laughed so hard in too long